Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

Shepherd Kreck III Questions Empirical Validity of Ecological Indian Stereotype Essay

Shepherd Kreck III Questions Empirical Validity of Ecological Indian Stereotype Essay

Shepherd Kreck III questions the empirical validity of the “ecological Indian” stereotype. He argues that historical Native American resource management made sense according to the ideas and myths through which Indians understood the world, and particularly their relationship to nature. He emphasizes that this cultural basis for resource management was not essentially the same as contemporary ‘ecological science’ and did not always lead to practices that conform to contemporary ‘conservation’ ideals. Kat Anderson, on the contrary, argues that California Indians “by keeping ecosystems in a modest or intermediate level of disturbance, in many senses Indians lived in ecological harmony with nature.” Answer one of the following questions.

  1. Which argument is more compelling? Use specific examples to support your claims.
  2. Krech’s argument has triggered a strong response from critics such as Sioux Indian historian and legal scholar Vine Deloria, who calls Krech’s argument “anti-Indian” and others who have accused Krech of implying that “American Indians must be stopped from controlling their own resources at any cost.” Why has Krech’s argument, which reviewer Kimberly Tallbear describes as well researched and largely valid, elicited such strong responses? And do you think that Krech’s argument has any ethical and/or political implications regarding contemporary Indian claims to authority over natural resource management?

Form requirement:

1. RRs should be written in the form of a response to an essay prompt, including:

  • A thesis statement (1 sentence) in the first (typically brief) paragraph responding clearly to the question asked (e.g., “In this essay I argue that…”)
  • A summary of the key points of your argument supporting your thesis (1-2 sentences directly following your thesis statement, and typically at the end of the first paragraph [e.g., “To support my argument, I consider points A, B and C.”])
  • A well-reasoned argument (typically 2-3 paragraphs after the thesis statement paragraph)
  • Topic sentences describing paragraph contents and reflecting key point in your argument
  • Sentences containing relevant information and analysis supporting your thesis
  • A conclusion sentence at the end of the final paragraph that expands on your thesis

2. Respond to the question based primarily on readings. There is no need to draw from outside material, though you may do so.

  • Write succinctly and clearly, editing out all unnecessary verbiage.
  • Use proper grammar and pay attention to writing style.
  • Summarize and/or use examples to support your thesis.
  • Demonstrate a close reading of the material and refer to specifics of authors’ arguments.
  • Paraphrase rather than using quotes, unless you want to highlight and/or analyze something specifically related to how an author says what you choose to quote.

3. Your personal opinions and feelings about the material are important, and you are strongly encouraged, but not required, to express these in the assignment. For instance, you may:

  • Relate issues and themes to contemporary social, environmental or political topics
  • Explore your feelings about the issues raised in terms of personal experiences
  • Comment on the ethical implications of the issues addressed by the question

Form: 1-2 pages total writing (no third pages, please).

  • 1.5 spacing / 1” margins / 12-point font.
  • Use parenthetic references for all citations of quotes and ideas drawn from readings, with page numbers in MLA format [e.g., (du Buys 1998, 23)]. Do not include a list of works cited, unless you cite material that is not on the course syllabus.

RRs please include content, form, creativity and writing quality

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Assignment Geeks only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Assignment Geeks are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Assignment Geeks is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Assignment Geeks, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.