advantages and disadvantages of involving physician
Week # 11 Discussion
There are several advantages and disadvantages of involving physician firms when carrying out FPA legislation. Full Practice Authority (FPA) is essential because it authorizes nurse practitioners to conduct activities such as diagnosing, interpreting, evaluating, and ordering diagnostic tests. Furthermore, it allows nurse practitioners to start and be in charge of treatments, such as prescribing medications. The essay will discuss the disadvantages and advantages of involving physician departments when pursuing FPA legislation and its rationale.
Advantages.
Collaborating with physician organizations with full practice authority will help to solve several issues in the modern healthcare department. FPA provides patients access to all services offered by physicians and enhances access to healthcare in remote areas. FPA delivers improved and efficient delivery care and streamlines care. FPA gives patients direct access to physician services anytime they are in need. Collaboration between physicians’ organizations and FPA is essential because it reduces costs by avoiding billing and duplication of services related to outdated physician oversight of Nursing Practitioner practice (American Association of Nurse Practitioners Website, April 2022). In addition, FPA minimizes the unnecessary recurring of orders, care services, and office visits. FPA allows patients to be treated by a physician of their choice without any limitations or restrictions. Physicians and nurse practitioners who have acquired full practice authority are accessible to clients with addiction issues where they can treat and prescribe. Moreover, physicians’ organizations with full practice authority provide care and treatment to the aging group. In addition, nurse practitioners with full practice authority can fill the gaps of the insufficient workforce in remote areas with aging populations.
Disadvantages.
The provision of full practice authority to physicians has several disadvantages. Full practice authority may lead to a raised number of medication errors. Research shows that 65% of physicians make mistakes in distributing pills, and medication errors may increase when there is no close monitoring. In addition, physician organizations provided with the full practice authority to treat and prescribe medicines may have inadequate knowledge and skills to offer the appropriate medications or give the correct treatments. Physician organizations with nurses who are not well equipped with knowledge may result in a significant threat to clients’ wellbeing and general health. Moreover, collaborating full practice authority in physician organizations may undermine other healthcare systems due to the inefficient methods and techniques to manage all prescriptions offered by nurses based on their new abilities.
In conclusion, a collaboration of physician organizations with full practice authority helps to improve the accessibility of healthcare, provide services at low costs, and enable those in remote areas to access affordable treatments in their regions. However, full practice authority has several disadvantages, including increased medication errors and nurse practitioners’ inadequate knowledge and skills in prescribing drugs.
Reference
American Association of Nurse Practitioners Website (April 2022 ). Issues at a Glance: Full Practice Authority https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/policy-briefs/issues-full-practice-brief
Carson-Newman University Online (2021). The Benefits of Full Practice Authority for Nurse Practitioners. https://onlinenursing.cn.edu/news/np-benefits-of-full-practice-authority
Belkis Caballero Rodriguez – Monday, July 18, 2022, 6:05 PM
Number of replies: 1
FPA Legislation Through Physician Organizations
One method for medical practitioners to pursue Full Practice Authority (FPA) legislation is to collaborate with physician organizations, which has both pros and cons. Physician organizations are formed to engage physicians through clinical care enterprise leadership, governance, and decision-making (American Hospital Association, 2019). Therefore, working under a physician organization provides access to more resources, includes high performance teams, and simplifies management processes for the physician. In contrast, Full Practice Authority (FPA) legislation allows medical practitioners to evaluate patients, conduct diagnoses, interpret diagnostic tests, and initiate and manage treatments independently and without the collaboration or supervision of a medical board. Thus, working under physician organizations has some drawbacks because the organization conducts overall management and decision making, limiting the physician’s medical managerial competency. Thus, pursuing FPA legislation through a physician organization has a number of pros and cons that must be closely examined.
Pursuing FPA legislation through a physician organization provides numerous benefits to medical practitioners. Most importantly, administrative burdens are not imposed on physicians as this is already taken care of, allowing them to focus fully on medical practice. Work is done collaboratively by high-performance teams in physician organizations, allowing the physicians to strengthen their medical understanding through constant discussions and detailed explanations (Rabkin & Frein, 2021). Physicians are also saved the expense of acquiring new personnel equipment and records as they are already owned by established organizations. Patients prefer consulting with well-established and cohesive bodies that offer memberships and personalized care, so the number of patients the physician examines increases substantially. As a result, the physician gains more interpersonal skills through interaction with a broader range of patients. Issues can be handled quickly with effective organization-oriented interventions in the event of a problem, which can improve the medical practitioner’s experience (Carrau & Janis, 2021). Therefore, pursuing FPA legislation through a physician organization can be extremely beneficial for physicians because it provides better access to resources and a strong support structure.
Despite the benefits of pursuing FPA legislation through a physician organization, it is also crucial for physicians to understand the limitations involved. Operational restrictions exist in most established organizations, including physician organizations. For example, activity scheduling is controlled by the organization, limiting the medical practitioner’s choices. Furthermore, there are performance expectations placed on physicians. These rules mean a loss of freedom of practice, creating a struggle between clinical freedom of practices and autonomy (Rabkin & Frein, 2021). Performance expectations can result in physician burnout further affecting their ability to provide quality care through increased medical errors, which reflects on patient satisfaction (Carrau & Janis, 2021). Furthermore, decision-making is delegated to other people, which takes time, delaying activities that require prompt action. This limits the ability of the physician to make independent decisions, which is absolutely indispensable. Physician organizations also follow set rules and policies, which can be perceived as a disadvantage. Therefore, when deciding whether to pursue FPA legislation through a physician organization, it is critical to consider these cons for better decision making.
In conclusion, pursuing FPA legislation through a physician body has its advantages and disadvantages. On one side, the medical practitioner is accorded plenty of support through management, resources, and knowledge. However, they are limited in terms of what they can practice and how they do it. Thus, this becomes a battle of support and freedom, which requires careful investigation from both the pro and con sides before making the decision to pursue FPA legislation through a physician.
References
Rabkin, S. W., & Frein, M. (2021). Overcoming obstacles to develop high-performance teams involving physician in health care organizations. Healthcare, 9(9), 1136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091136
Carrau, D., & Janis, J. E. (2021). Physician burnout: Solutions for individuals and organizations. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open, 9(2), 3418. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003418
American Hospital Association. (2019, May 14). Governance of Physician Organizations. https://www.aha.org/resources/2019-05-14-governance-physician-organizations
