Discussion 4: Effects of Artificial Intelligence Regarding Student Learning and Research
Description
Please note that all articles for weekly discussions are current scholarly articles that will assist you in future research. In addition, you will need to find one extra scholarly article for this discussion to support your thoughts. No books and no trade journals can be used, only current scholarly journals (past 5 to 7 years) that are labelled academic, peer-reviewed, or refereed journals. All references must align with in-text citations and be complete with all information (i.e., authors, date, title, source) to include the DOI or the URL. This will help faculty retrieve the source to determine if the source meets the requirements of the submission.
For this week’s discussion, I would like you to read the three attached scholarly articles regarding artificial intelligence. Once you have read all three articles, please summarize from your point of view new knowledge learned from each article. Each response per article needs at least one paragraph consisting of at least 5 to 6 academic sentences.
AI-Generated Research Paper Fabrication and Plagiarism in the Scientific Community, by Elali and Rachid (2023)
Elali and Rachid 2023 article on AI-generated research.pdfDownload Elali and Rachid 2023 article on AI-generated research.pdf
Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, Plagiarism and Basic Honesty, by Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit (2023).
Short brief by Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit on AI Plagiarism Honesty.pdfDownload Short brief by Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit on AI Plagiarism Honesty.pdf
Out of the Laboratory and into the Classroom: Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education, by Schiff (2020).
Schiff 2020 article on the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education.pdfDownload Schiff 2020 article on the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education.pdf
Always use first person.
No attachments for any discussions . . . Please submit in the text box area.
No generative artificial intelligence can be used as sources for discussions and peer responses.
No Secondary Sources, No Direct Quotes, No Bullets, No Abbreviations, No Acronyms, and No Contractions allowed . . . your full interpretation of the content and in an academic sentence/paragraph format (i.e., at least 5 to 6 sentences per paragraph). Your response should be a minimum of 500 words and should address each of the questions presented. In addition, your “two” peer responses must be at least 100 words. Review the attached rubric.