Test Plan, Training Plan, and Maintenance Methodology
Get perfect grades by consistently using www.assignmentgeeks.org. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Develop test plan, training plan, and maintenance methodology for SanGrafix, a video game design company. Each test and maintenance methodology should include a method for testing applications, operating systems, network connectivity, speed, load testing, interoperability, permissions, and security. Please research and come up with a comprehensive plan. The following files have been supplied for your use:
- Guide to Test, Training, and Exercise Programs for IT Plans and Capabilities (SP800-84)
Attached Files:
- SP800-84.pdf (453.774 KB)
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: Case Study and Structured Assignment Rubric
Description:
This rubric will be used for case studies and assignments.
Unsatisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%) Does not present an analysis of the issues identified or demonstrate an understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). |
Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified and demonstrates a somewhat acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). |
Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). |
Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%) Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). |
Evaluation |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%) Makes no connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading. Does not Support diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective. |
Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates limited command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument. |
Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective. |
Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%) Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective. |
Recommendations |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%) Does not present realistic or appropriate recommendations and offers no support from the information presented and concepts from the reading. |
Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading. |
Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Presents specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading. |
Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%) Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading. |
Research |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%) Does not supplement case study with research and documentation. |
Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Supplements case study with limited research into the present situation of the company; provides limited documentation of sources consulted. |
Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Supplements case study with relevant research into the present situation of the company; documents all sources of information. |
Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%) Supplements case study with relevant and extensive research into the present situation of the company; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of information. |
Writing Mechanics |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%) Writing is extremely unfocused, rambling, or contains major errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; extremely disorganized. Does not use APA guidelines. |
Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines. |
Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized. Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources. |
Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%) Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized. Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources. |
Name:Case Study and Structured Assignment Rubric
Description:
This rubric will be used for case studies and assignments.
FOLLOW THE ATTACHED FILE RUBRIC FOR PAPER REFERENCE
Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.
Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper