Test Plan, Training Plan, and Maintenance Methodology

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.assignmentgeeks.org. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Develop test plan, training plan, and maintenance methodology for SanGrafix, a video game design company. Each test and maintenance methodology should include a method for testing applications, operating systems, network connectivity, speed, load testing, interoperability, permissions, and security. Please research and come up with a comprehensive plan. The following files have been supplied for your use:

  • Guide to Test, Training, and Exercise Programs for IT Plans and Capabilities (SP800-84)

Attached Files:

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: Case Study and Structured Assignment Rubric

Description:
This rubric will be used for case studies and assignments.

UnsatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodExcellent
Analysis

Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)

Does not present an analysis of the issues identified or demonstrate an understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified and demonstrates a somewhat acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)

Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Evaluation

Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)

Makes no connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading. Does not Support diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective.

Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates limited command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument.

Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.

Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)

Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.

Recommendations

Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)

Does not present realistic or appropriate recommendations and offers no support from the information presented and concepts from the reading.

Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading.

Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Presents specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading.

Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)

Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading.

Research

Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)

Does not supplement case study with research and documentation.

Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Supplements case study with limited research into the present situation of the company; provides limited documentation of sources consulted.

Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Supplements case study with relevant research into the present situation of the company; documents all sources of information.

Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)

Supplements case study with relevant and extensive research into the present situation of the company; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of information.

Writing Mechanics

Points Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)

Writing is extremely unfocused, rambling, or contains major errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; extremely disorganized. Does not use APA guidelines.

Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines.

Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized. Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources.

Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)

Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized. Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources.

Name:Case Study and Structured Assignment Rubric

Description:
This rubric will be used for case studies and assignments.



FOLLOW ALL THE ABOVE STEPS AS MENTIONED
APA FORMAT
NO PLAGIARISM

FOLLOW THE ATTACHED FILE RUBRIC FOR PAPER REFERENCE

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper