Health and Wealth Case Study


Case Study Project

(first draft and revised draft)

Overview

For this final project you will continue with the social issue that you selected (language and power; freedom and security; health and wealth) and you will write an essay where you discuss your perspective. You will use the ideas and information from the summary-response and the quote log to write your case study. You will submit a first draft and a revised draft of this assignment.

Content

  • Describe a “real life” instance of your selected social issue in a professional or a personal setting.
  • Discuss your perspective on your selected social issue, including the reasons for your viewpoint.
  • Discuss how your core values inform or influence your perspective on your selected social issue.
  • Demonstrate that you are really thinking about your issue—don’t settle for easy answers, don’t pretend that conflicting evidence doesn’t exist, and don’t feel that you have to take an either-or position.
  • Discuss the complexities of your selected social issue. For example, do not just conclude that using academic language is always good, or that government surveillance is always bad, or that wealth automatically leads to health. Think about the intricacies of these issues and how they play out in everyday life.

Organization

  • Include an introductory paragraph, where you clearly outline a “real-life” instance of your social issue and you give a thesis statement that indicates your perspective (see Part 2: Writing Your Introduction for an example).
  • Include three body paragraphs where you include details, examples, and quotes from at least three of the course readings to help you develop and support your key points (see Part 3: Writing Your Body Paragraphs. for an example).
  • Include one body paragraph where you discuss how your core values inform or influence your perspective on your selected social issue (see Part 3: Writing Your Body Paragraphs. for an example).
  • End your essay with a concluding paragraph where you restate your thesis, summarize your key points, and leave the reader with the “so what?” ( see Part 4: Writing Your Conclusion for an example).

iron deficiency

Case Study Topic: include in text citations in every paragraph

iron deficiency and explain the expected alterations in laboratory values seen in patients with this condition.

Analyze current evidence-based treatment modalities specific to the aging population and include evidence-based treatment guidelines for the selected processes.

Conduct an evidence-based literature search to identify the most recent standards of care/treatment modalities from peer-reviewed articles and professional association guidelines (www.guideline.gov). These articles and guidelines can be referenced, but not directly copied into the clinical case presentation. Cite a minimum of three resources.

Include the following in your clinical case presentation:

  1. A discussion of the pathophysiology of the disease, including signs and symptoms
  2. An explanation of diagnostic testing and rationales for each
  3. A review of different evidence-based treatment modalities for the disorder obtained from guideline.gov or a professional organization such as thyroid (American Thyroid Association, OB-GYN (ACOG), urology (AUA), etc.

Next, address the following questions:

  1. How does the information in this case inform the practice of a master’s prepared nurse?
  2. How should the master’s prepared nurse use this information to design a patient education session for someone with this condition?
  3. What was the most important information presented in this case?
  4. What was the most confusing or challenging information presented in this case?
  5. Discuss a patient safety issue that can be addressed for a patient with the condition presented in this case.

The use of medical terminology and appropriate graduate level writing is expected.

Your paper should be 3 pages (excluding cover page and reference page).

Your resources must include research articles as well as reference to non-research evidence-based guidelines.

Use APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Your source(s) should be integrated into the paragraphs. Use internal citations pointing to evidence in the literature and supporting your ideas. You will need to include a reference page listing those sources. Cite a minimum of three resources.

Answer the following IN YOUR OWN WORDS. It will be ran thru a plagiarism checker, thanks

Answer the following IN YOUR OWN WORDS. It will be ran thru a plagiarism checker, thanks

Scenario: Kaiser Permanente’s Innovations Consultancy

Lew McCreary
(2010) describes how Kaiser Permanente, a managed care consortium based in
Oakland, California, has developed a novel approach to innovation and
improvement. The company set up its own internal Innovation Consultancy unit.
This unit employs change experts to observe people, ask them how they feel
about their work, take notes and photographs, make drawings, and identify
better ways of doing things. This involves, McCreary (p. 92) suggests, “a
combination of anthropology, journalism, and empathy,” exploring how staff and
patients live, work, think, and feel before trying to solve a problem.

A key part of the
approach involves “uncovering the untold story”—finding out “what is really
going on here?” For example, to prevent nurses being interrupted during
medication rounds, and thus to reduce errors, a “deep dive” event was held,
including nurses, doctors, pharmacists, and patients. The event generated
around 400 ideas, some straightforward and some “outlandish.” This led to the
design of a smock that said “leave me alone” on it (known as “no-interruption
wear”) and a five-step process for ensuring the correct dispensing of
medication.

Another example concerned the exchange of patient information between nursing shifts. This used to take 45 minutes, and delayed the next shift’s contact with patients. In addition, nurses would compile and exchange information in idiosyncratic ways, potentially missing important details. The revised Nurse Knowledge Exchange is faster and more reliable, with new software and with information presented in standard formats.

Members of the Information Consultancy unit do not dictate the changes that are to be made, but work with staff as “co-designers” on change projects. This approach allows Kaiser Permanente to achieve the aim of implementing innovation and change quickly and economically.

Write a 525- to 700-word paper in which you:

  • Identify processes, work units, interdepartmental committees, etc., within an organizational structure that are being evaluated by the Consultancy in order to promote a proactive approach toward change.
  • Discuss what barriers you perceive existed within the segments of the consortium that hindered change prior to the innovative and improvement approach that waslaunched.
  • Incorporate the underlying skill sets discussed in the case study. Draw upon your readings in Ch.12, “The Effective Change Manager: What Does It Take?”

Format your paper consistent
with APA guidelines.

Title page with name

Page numbers in the header on the right-hand side starting on the first page. Running head is not required.

Double spacing in 12-point font

An introduction that will say what the paper is about.

A conclusion that “wraps” up the points in your paper.

Paper should be written in first person (I, we) and should not use the 2nd person “you”

At least two references. The reference is not valid unless there is at least one citation to go with it.

Each paragraph is indented 5 spaces.

Direct quotations should be used sparingly when writing a paper. If a direct quotation is used, it should have “quotation marks” at the beginning and end and a citation with the author, year, and page/paragraph #. Every citation must have a reference listed to go with it.

Paraphrasing means taking someone else’s ideas and putting them in your own words. The originator of the ideas must be giving credit. To cite ideas that are paraphrased, use the author and the year of publication. Every citation must have a reference listed to go with it.

REMEMBER: If you quote or paraphrase from the case analysis above, it has to be cited (see the examples above)

Here is how the textbook is referenced:

Palmer, I., Dunford, R. & Buchanan, D. (2017). Managing Organizational Change: A Multiple Perspectives Approach. 3rd Edition. NY: McGraw Hill.

A TOPIC IN MEDIA AND SOCIETY

NO PLAGIARISM

ORIGINAL THOUGHTS ONLY

PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS

USE A TOPIC IN MEDIA AND SOCIETY///SOCIAL MEDIA

  1. If you are using the Blackboard Mobile Learn IOS App, please click “View in Browser.”Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
    Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

    Click the link above to submit your assignment.

    Assignment 2: Position Paper Two – Media and Society
    Due Week 10 and worth 250 points

    This is the second of two (2) position papers based on the following scenario to be completed in this course.
    Imagine that you are running for a state office (e.g., governor, senator, or representative) and you have to prepare a position paper for a debate on controversial issues in the news. (Select one (1) of the topics addressed in Weeks 5-9 of this class.) You will want your position paper to demonstrate critical thinking, sound logic, valid claims, personal passion, and credible support that is cited correctly because the paper will be provided to the news media before the debate and will be scrutinized by the media and reported on regarding these criteria. Your professor will serve as your close advisor whose job is to review the paper and provide feedback to you on the paper’s strengths and weaknesses.

    Write a two to three (2-3) page (700 to 1,200 words) paper in which you:

    1. Introduce your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. (It’s important to grab the audience’s interest and inform them of what the main and support points are.)
    2. Provide three or four (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. (Put each major point in a separate paragraph.)
    3. Provide one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view.
    4. Organized arguments and support for claims effectively.
    5. Demonstrate personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims.
    6. Provide two to three (2-3) credible and reliable references (in addition to the text) about current events, which have been published in the last five (5) years and are cited correctly in the position paper. (Wikipedia is not an acceptable source.)

    Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

    • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    • Apply critical thinking skills to the analysis of issues involving mass media and society.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in media and society.
    • Write clearly and concisely about media and society using proper writing mechanics.
    • Note: Depending on the student’s topic selection, the outcome measured might include one of the following:
    • Evaluate the appropriateness of various media forms for different audiences.
    • Analyze selected legal issues and policy regulations pertaining to the media.
    • Determine how new forms of technology impact first amendment rights
    • Analyze various issues affecting the media business.
    • Evaluate the effects of new forms of media (e.g., online services) on social interactions.
    • Evaluate the effects of the digital information expansion / explosion on society.

    Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

    Click here to view the grading rubric.

  2. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

Short paper

It is essential to understand the development of one’s own industry in context of the factors that drove change in the past. These may also be some of the same factors that will continue to drive change in the future.

Based on the business plan you created in MBA 560: Marketing and Strategy, describe the impact of those factors of change identified in your discussion posting this week. Identify key obstacles/opportunities that necessitated the changes and the nature of changes made in the related industry. The assessment should include a section on both the enabling factors and the inhibiting factors that drove the change. The force field analysis technique can be used to help illustrate this concept. The related article and video in the module resources can help you with this concept.

Follow the grading rubirc,2 pages long, APA style

Divorce / The Letter

This is a TWO part assignment! The letter has to be written apart from the Essay……….

Part 1 – Letter

Part 2 – Essay

In this assignment, you are the significantly older brother or sister of a child approaching adolescence.

Write a letter between 500-750 words in which you explain what he or she can expect to experience both socially and emotionally during adolescence.

Be gender-specific; choose one or the other to focus upon.

Share both the bright and dark sides of this time period and share ideas on how to get through it in the healthiest manner. Let him or her in on what you wished you had known. Share how your behaviors in adolescence impacted the rest of the family.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing and a title page is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

RuBric Below for the Letter

nsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Letter Describes Social Expectations During Adolescence

Letter omits or incompletely describes what can be expected socially during adolescence. Letter does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Letter inadequately describes what can be expected socially during adolescence. Letter demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Letter adequately describes what can be expected socially during adolescence. Letter demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Letter clearly describes what can be expected socially during adolescence, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Letter expertly describes what can be expected socially during adolescence, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

20.0 %Letter Describes Emotional Expectations During Adolescence

Letter omits or incompletely describes what can be expected emotionally during adolescence. Letter does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Letter inadequately describes what can be expected emotionally during adolescence. Letter demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Letter adequately describes what can be expected emotionally during adolescence. Letter demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Letter clearly describes what can be expected emotionally during adolescence, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Letter expertly describes what can be expected emotionally during adolescence, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

15.0 %Letter Shares Ideas to Get Through Adolescence

Letter omits or incompletely describes ideas to help get through adolescence as well as what the author wishes they would have known during adolescence. Letter does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Letter inadequately describes ideas to help get through adolescence as well as what the author wishes they would have known during adolescence. Letter demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Letter adequately describes ideas to help get through adolescence as well as what the author wishes they would have known during adolescence. Letter demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Letter clearly describes ideas to help get through adolescence as well as what the author wishes they would have known during adolescence, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Letter expertly describes ideas to help get through adolescence as well as what the author wishes they would have known during adolescence, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

15.0 %Letter Shares How Behaviors Impact the Rest of the Family

Letter omits or incompletely describes how behaviors in adolescence impacted the rest of the family. Letter does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Letter inadequately describes how behaviors in adolescence impacted the rest of the family. Letter demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Letter adequately describes how behaviors in adolescence impacted the rest of the family. Letter demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Letter clearly describes how behaviors in adolescence impacted the rest of the family, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Letter expertly describes how behaviors in adolescence impacted the rest of the family, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Letter demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

The divorce rate in the United States remains at an all-time high.

Write a 1,000-1,250-word essay in which you consider the socioemotional response of adults and adolescents regarding divorce and custody arrangements. You are encouraged to use attachment theory in your paper. Address the following in your paper:

  1. Steps that can be taken to minimize the number of divorces
  2. Steps that can be taken to help children cope more effectively with their parents’ divorce
  3. A discussion of how a professional counselor can provide support for all the parties involved
  4. Discuss ethical and cultural strategies for promoting resilience, optimum development, and wellness in adolescence.
  5. Include a minimum of three scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:

2.F.3.f: Systemic and environmental factors that affect human development, functioning, and behavior.

2.F.3.i. Ethical and culturally relevant strategies for promoting resilience and optimum development and wellness across the lifespan.


RUBRIC

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Steps to Minimize the Number of Divorces

Paper omits or incompletely describes what steps can be taken to minimize the number of divorces. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper inadequately describes what steps can be taken to minimize the number of divorces. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper adequately describes what steps can be taken to minimize the number of divorces. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper clearly describes what steps can be taken to minimize the number of divorces, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper expertly describes what steps can be taken to minimize the number of divorces, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

15.0 %Steps to Help Children Cope

Paper omits or incompletely describes the steps that can be taken to help children cope more effectively with their parents? divorce. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper inadequately describes the steps that can be taken to help children cope more effectively with their parents? divorce. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper adequately describes the steps that can be taken to help children cope more effectively with their parents? divorce. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper clearly describes the steps that can be taken to help children cope more effectively with their parents? divorce, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper expertly describes the steps that can be taken to help children cope more effectively with their parents? divorce, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

15.0 %Professional Counselor Support

Paper omits or incompletely describes how a professional counselor can provide support for all involved parties. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper inadequately describes how a professional counselor can provide support for all involved parties. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper adequately describes how a professional counselor can provide support for all involved parties. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper clearly describes how a professional counselor can provide support for all involved parties, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper expertly describes how a professional counselor can provide support for all involved parties, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

20.0 %Ethical and Cultural Strategies in Adolescence

Paper omits or incompletely describes the ethical and cultural strategies that can be used to promote resilience, optimum development, and wellness in adolescence. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper inadequately describes the ethical and cultural strategies that can be used to promote resilience, optimum development, and wellness in adolescence. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper adequately describes the ethical and cultural strategies that can be used to promote resilience, optimum development, and wellness in adolescence. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper clearly describes the ethical and cultural strategies that can be used to promote resilience, optimum development, and wellness in adolescence, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper expertly describes the ethical and cultural strategies that can be used to promote resilience, optimum development, and wellness in adolescence, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

What are the main criteria we should judge the quality of the governance of international organizations?

What are the main criteria by which we should judge the quality of the
governance of international organizations (whether IGO’s or NGOs)? In
your answer discuss at least two different criteria by which we can
measure the quality of governance of IGOs. Do you believe that the UN
Charter offers a blueprint for good governance?

Your initial submission

(your answer) should demonstrate both your knowledge of the course

materials and your knowledge of the topic. It should be analytical in

nature and explain your logic. Your answer should be 200-300 words long

and be free from grammatical and proofreading errors. Please cite your

sources using the reference list format within the Turabian style. For

examples, please see the Turabian Quick Guide located under the

resources link.

final untest

Final Untest

The Final Untest is just like the Midterm Untest and comes at the
beginning of the Units and not at the end and I encourage everyone to
talk about these course materials through participation avenues (Piazza
and video comments) to gain a deeper understanding of the history, which
will improve your untest.

Remember that although I encourage you to discuss important elements of the units with each other, the Untest is an individual assignment – everyone must do their own original work.

Start thinking about the untest as you work through Units 3 and 4 –
no need to cram at the end. Answer the Reflective Questions as you move
through each lesson and case study (this will also help you deepen your
understanding of materials for the untest) and turn in the Reflective
Question set at the end of Unit 4 for extra credit.

Open the file to view your Untest. The upload for the Untest will be at the end of Unit 4.

Peer reviewed business journal article

Need to separate 4 page papers, not including the title and reference pages… Abstract not required.

Week 5: Journal Article #3

Students will write a two-page summary of a peer reviewed business journal article. Please include a Title Page with a Running Head title, Centering Information (that includes a title, your name, and Webster University) for this assignment). The summary should thoroughly address each of the following:

  1. Title, Author (s), Journal, Date, Volume, Number, Pages.
  2. Introduction/Purpose. What basic question is the investigator trying to answer? Why?
  3. Method/Design
    1. What or who are the participants? What method is used to collect the research data? Is this a quantitative or qualitative study? Why?
    2. What task do they perform or what tests do they take, or what characteristics are measured?
  4. Results. What were the main findings in the study?
  5. Discussion. In general, what did the study demonstrate? What are the implications of study? What questions remain for further research?
  6. Criticisms. Point out at least two strengths and weaknesses in the research. Explain these criticisms thoroughly.
  7. Attach a copy of the peer reviewed business journal article you used for this assignment.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Use the following template for the paper… APA_Template_With_Advice_(6th_Ed) .doc

Week 6: Journal Review #4

Students will write a two-page summary of a peer reviewed business journal article. Please include a Title Page with a Running Head title, Centering Information (that includes a title, your name, and Webster University) for this assignment). The summary should thoroughly address each of the following:

  1. Title, Author (s), Journal, Date, Volume, Number, Pages.
  2. Introduction. What basic question is the investigator trying to answer? Why?
  3. Method
    1. What or who are the participants?
    2. What task do they perform or what tests do they take, or what characteristics are measured?
  4. Results. What were the main findings in the study?
  5. Discussion. In general, what did the study demonstrate? What are the implications of study? What questions remain for further research?
  6. Criticisms. Point out at least two weaknesses in the research. Explain these criticisms thoroughly.
  7. Attach a copy of the peer reviewed business journal article you used for this assignment.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Use the following template for the paper… APA_Template_With_Advice_(6th_Ed) .doc

Week 7: Journal Review #5

Students will write a two-page summary of a peer reviewed business journal article. Please include a Title Page with a Running Head title, Centering Information (that includes a title, your name, and Webster University) for this assignment). The summary should thoroughly address each of the following:

  1. Title, Author (s), Journal, Date, Volume, Number, Pages.
  2. Introduction. What basic question is the investigator trying to answer? Why?
  3. Method
    1. What or who are the participants?
    2. What task do they perform or what tests do they take, or what characteristics are measured?
  4. Results. What were the main findings in the study?
  5. Discussion. In general, what did the study demonstrate? What are the implications of study? What questions remain for further research?
  6. Criticisms. Point out at least two weaknesses in the research. Explain these criticisms thoroughly.
  7. Attach a copy of the peer reviewed business journal article you used for this assignment.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Use the following template for the paper… APA_Template_With_Advice_(6th_Ed) .doc

Week 8: Journal Review #6

Students will write a two-page summary of a peer reviewed business journal article. Please include a Title Page with a Running Head title, Centering Information (that includes a title, your name, and Webster University) for this assignment). The summary should thoroughly address each of the following:

  1. Title, Author (s), Journal, Date, Volume, Number, Pages.
  2. Introduction. What basic question is the investigator trying to answer? Why?
  3. Method
    1. What or who are the participants?
    2. What task do they perform or what tests do they take, or what characteristics are measured?
  4. Results. What were the main findings in the study?
  5. Discussion. In general, what did the study demonstrate? What are the implications of study? What questions remain for further research?
  6. Criticisms. Point out at least two weaknesses in the research. Explain these criticisms thoroughly.
  7. Attach a copy of the peer reviewed business journal article you used for this assignment.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Use the following template for the paper… APA_Template_With_Advice_(6th_Ed) .doc

Assignment: Are You Fatigued?

In this assignment, analyze your risk for fatigue by creating a sleep/work and discussing your findings for the 72-hour period. You may use the FAA Fatigue Risk Assessment Tool/Pulsarinformatics.com (Links to an external site.) (note that this tool will require you to install software on your computer), the NTSB example format (the image shown on this page), or create your own format. Things to consider:

  1. Are you a shift worker?
  2. What is your baseline requirement?
  3. Did you experience acute sleep loss? Cumulative sleep debt?
  4. Do you recall how you felt during these periods?
  5. While fatigued, were you undertaking any of the following:
      1. Intense physical or mental labor/play (e.g. sporting event)
      2. Periods of repetitive or monotonous work
      3. Periods of task saturation
  6. During the hours we refer to as the circadian troughs (generally around 0300/0400 and 1500/1600 hours), were you undertaking any of the following:
      1. Intense physical or mental labor/play (e.g. sporting event)
      2. Periods of repetitive or monotonous work
      3. Periods of task saturation

Note: Acute sleep loss follows any sleep period where you did not achieve baseline sleep in 24 hours. Cumulative sleep debt is reached when you have lost a full baseline of sleep before sleeping for a baseline. For example, my baseline is 6 hours. If I slept 3 hours Monday, I have acute sleep loss. If on Tuesday I again sleep only three hours, I now have 6 hours lost sleep overall, which is my baseline. This is considered cumulative sleep debt.

Incorporate the matrix into your document. Your analysis should be 2-4 pages of double-spaced text. apa format