HC 466 Herzing University Week 7 Strategic Planning Models Presentation

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.assignmentgeeks.org. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Unit 7 Assignment 2 – Strategic Planning Models

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

A strategic planning model can be helpful in assisting leadership in making decisions that impact the organization. Communicating purpose behind changes (and strategies involved) is part of being a leader. In this assessment, select a strategic planning model and prepare an employee presentation on change.

Instructions

  • Review the 5 strategic planning model infographics:
  • Recall the professional experience of change used in the assessments for Units 1-6.
    Select one of the 5 models to apply to the professional experience (used in Units 1-6).
  • Create a PowerPoint presentation to educate the managers and staff on the change (from the professional experience). The presentation should:
    • Describe the components of the selected model.
    • Explain how the model is being applied to the professional experience (used in Units 1-6).
    • Consist of at least 10 slides (not including the title slide and reference slide).
  • Complete additional research on this topic as necessary. Include at least 2 references, formatted APA style.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours, 30 minutes

a.

Rubric

HC466 – Unit 7 Assignment 2 – Strategic Planning Models

HC466 – Unit 7 Assignment 2 – Strategic Planning Models

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of KnowledgePRICE-P

30.0 pts

Level 5

Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

27.0 pts

Level 4

Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

24.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

21.0 pts

Level 2

Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

18.0 pts

Level 1

There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content

30.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

27.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

24.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

21.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research

20.0 pts

Level 5

Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes

10.0 pts

Level 5

Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).

6.0 pts

Level 1

Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper