Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on The Concepts of Sovereign Statehood. It needs to be at least 1250 words. Increased tensions were visible as the battle for supremacy was never an unexpected outcome.
However, after the world wars, the trend changed. Developed nations became responsible for global peace. For this reason, states developed to the institution level as they have the mandate to operate under their own will and mandate. Osiander asserts that the effects of the world war depicted how much global peace was a necessity (280). The author further points out that global peace increased the growth of developed countries (Osiander 280). However, countries in Africa were still under colonization as the Struggle for independence ensued. At the time the battle to end the European supremacy in Africa was becoming a significant trend. Mingst& Snyderare of the assumption that the fight for independence in Africa completed the trend of state sovereignty (98). The independence Africa of African states also has them the mandate to operate under their own mandate. However, what changed this trend? Did the institutional state of countries have a negative effect on the globe? This is after considering that the nation-state is not relevant in the modern century.
In an argument by Muller external forces in the modern century bear more significance than the nation-states (89). Many nations have experienced external influence either directly or indirectly. The change caused by these external factors has been significant in the sovereignty of states. For instance, political tension experienced in Arab countries and Africa has attributed to the influence of western nations. Muller asserts that political tension in independent nations has mostly been cause by external factors that seek to benefit from the role of a certain regime (97). For instance, the dictatorship regime of President Muammar Gadhafi of Libya was influenced towards its termination by western influence. Western nations felt discontent by the leader’s way of leadership. .