Please read Camarena case .pdf followed by these two online articles: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/fbi-overstated-forensic-hair-matches-in-nearly-all-criminal-trials-for-decades/2015/04/

Please read Camarena case .pdf followed by these two online articles:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/fbi-overstated-forensic-hair-matches-in-nearly-all-criminal-trials-for-decades/2015/04/18/39c8d8c6-e515-11e4-b510-962fcfabc310_story.html?utm_term=.8bb76f64627bLinks to an external site.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-testimony-on-microscopic-hair-analysis-contained-errors-in-at-least-90-percent-of-cases-in-ongoing-reviewLinks to an external site.

Please answer the following:

1.) Please describe and discuss the most surprising aspects of the articles presented above.

2.) Does the information contained in the above articles fundamentally change your conclusions or view of the Camarena case? Please explain why or why not?